A Pattern of Consistent ReVictimization Aided By Massachusetts State Officials

This is one of MANY patterns we have uncovered of misappropriation of resources and funding that were designed to protect victims of abuse.

In this case, why is the State of Massachusetts NOT responding to such outrageous conduct by a State Official? This form seen below CLEARLY shows Jack Sullivan, head criminal clerk of the Plymouth Criminal Clerks office, Altering this document.  There is other documentation to show he tried to tell the victim Judge Monahan did it when he did. Yes we have documented evidence.  This is NOT hearsay.

This victim of abuse had her basic civil rights violated.  HOW?  The dates were whited out and changed. The docket number was changed to a new one as if this was a NEW complaint.  This victim of abuse was charged three times for stealing her own mortgage money that legally belonged to her on a house that legally belonged to her as well.  This woman suffered tremendous embarrassment, pain, financial devastation, and abuse as she was charged THREE TIMES for the SAME crime.  Go figure.  Each time having her name smeared in the paper for a crime she did NOT commit.  BTW all charges each time were dismissed. 

We would like to know WHY the DA has not investigated this vile act by a highly respected court official as he violated this victim's rights by denying her right to a fair hearing. The notes on the bottom and side substantiate the alterations. This form had been requested numerous times by the victim (defendant) and denied until AFTER Jack Sullivan resigned ironically approximately 30 days after the victim went into Boston and filed a complaint with the Attorney General's Office who told her there is NOTHING they can do as they are underfunded.

What are our tax payer dollars for if the very services designed to protect victims of abuse are misappropriated for batterers to continue their patterns of abuse after a victim leaves her abuser?

So why hasn't the DA or the state of MA investigated or responded to the victims allegations of abuse of process, abuse of power, malicious prosecution, moral turpitude, dv by proxy and more?

WHY CARE?
Why should this matter if charges were dropped ALL three times?  Because this victim's reputation has been significantly tarnished.  She has been denied housing, employment, schooling, and these charges were used to take custody away from her as well as force her to supervised visitation and at some points no contact with her children despite the fact ALL the evidence proves her innocence. 

DOUBT IT?  Email us and we will send the documentation of systemic failures, abuse and corruption to reputable press members or advocates for abuse victims.  Our priority is to protect victims of continued abuse, not to subject them to further abuse.